Evidence
Technical findings grounded in what the assessment demonstrated.
turtledovecyber
Work with CREST, OSCP, and CSTM qualified testers at Turtledove Cyber to undertake your Pentesting - Whether you fancy a new team for your yearly testing, or you're looking for your first pentest to meet client requirements affordably.

Penetration testing is an authorised security assessment of defined systems. It combines technical tools with manual investigation to find weaknesses, test their exploitability and understand their consequences. The focus is on how systems behave under attack, including weaknesses that a scanner alone may miss.
Turtledove tests applications, infrastructure and cloud environments, alongside social engineering, red teaming and the security of AI features. Findings connect technical evidence to business impact, with practical recommendations for the people making fixes and clear priorities for those overseeing the risk.

Turtledove was great. Savva and the team conducted a top-tier assessment with professionalism, excellent communication, and high-end technical capability.
They were easy to work with throughout, and the report quality stood well above what we've seen from other providers, detailed, thorough, and clearly the product of real care rather than a template.
Pentests can be one of the worst times of year for a tech company, but Turtledove made the process smooth and stress-free.
From an individual application to the systems and people behind it, we tailor the assessment to what you need to understand and protect.
Understand what an attacker could reach from inside your network. We examine identity, access and configuration weaknesses, including opportunities to move between systems or gain greater privileges.
See your internet-facing systems from an attacker’s perspective. We test exposed services and infrastructure for weaknesses that could provide an entry point or reveal sensitive information.
Explore how your application and its APIs handle real-world misuse. Testing covers authentication, permissions, data handling and business logic, including weaknesses that emerge when legitimate features are used in unexpected ways.
Examine the security of your cloud environment, from identities and permissions to exposed storage and services. We investigate how configuration choices and connected resources could allow unauthorised access or movement.
Take a closer look at how your infrastructure is configured. We review hardening, network separation, remote access and administrative controls to identify avoidable exposure and practical improvements.
Assess how people and processes respond to realistic deception. Agreed scenarios can include phishing and impersonation, helping you understand where verification, reporting and escalation need strengthening.
Test whether your organisation can detect and respond to an attacker pursuing an agreed objective. We connect techniques across systems, people and processes to assess how your defences work together.
Test the AI features within your tools and software. We examine prompt injection, sensitive-data exposure, unsafe outputs and excessive tool permissions, including whether an AI feature can be pushed beyond its intended boundaries.
Technical findings grounded in what the assessment demonstrated.
An explanation of the consequences, so priorities reflect the risk.
Practical recommendations that help the people responsible for fixing an issue.
One flat fee includes the test, the re-test and an updated report.
Once your team has made fixes, we re-test the affected findings to check whether the issues have been resolved. Your updated penetration test report reflects the remediation work and makes clear what has been fixed and what still needs attention.
That gives your board and executive team a clear view of progress: the original risk, the work completed and the risk that remains. Your technical team gets evidence that its fixes have addressed the findings.
Scanning provides repeatable checks for known weaknesses. Penetration testing adds manual investigation, validation and analysis of the impact within a defined scope. The two approaches complement each other.
A test covers an agreed scope at a particular time. It provides valuable evidence, but changes to software, configuration and threats can introduce new risks afterwards.